Final Project Evaluation

Overall Assessment Structure

The final project is worth 10 points total, representing a significant portion of your course grade. The evaluation is distributed across five components that assess different aspects of your business English competency and professional communication skills.

Component Breakdown

Component	Points	Percentage
Presentation Slides	2 points	20%
Written Report	2 points	20%
Recorded Presentation	2 points	20%
Peer Evaluations (2)	2 points	20%
Organization & Delivery	2 points	20%

Detailed Evaluation Criteria

Presentation Slides (2 points)

Your slides will be evaluated on professional design, content organization, and language quality.

Effective (2 points)

Professional design with consistent, engaging visual elements
Engaging visuals including relevant charts, diagrams, or high-quality images
Concise text with key points only (no text-heavy slides)
Error-free language with proper grammar, spelling, and business vocabulary
Logical structure with clear introduction, main points, and conclusion
Appropriate use of specialized terminology from course units

Mostly effective/Somewhat ineffective (1 point)

Adequate design with some visual elements and reasonable consistency
Some visuals though may be limited or not always relevant
Mostly concise text with occasional wordiness
Few errors in language, grammar, or spelling
Generally logical structure with minor organizational issues
Basic use of business vocabulary with some specialized terms

Ineffective/Incomplete (0 points)

Poor design with inconsistent formatting or unprofessional appearance
Text-heavy slides with excessive content that overwhelms the audience
Numerous errors in grammar, spelling, or vocabulary usage
Lacks visual elements or uses inappropriate/low-quality images
Disorganized structure that confuses rather than clarifies the message

Written Report (2 points)

Your report will be assessed on research depth, language proficiency, and professional document standards.

Effective (2 points)

Comprehensive information demonstrating thorough research and analysis
Well-structured with clear sections, headings, and logical flow
Excellent business vocabulary with sophisticated, precise terminology
Proper citations using consistent format (APA recommended)
Error-free writing with professional tone throughout
Integration of course concepts from multiple units effectively
Meets word count requirements (1500-2000 words)

Mostly effective/Somewhat ineffective (1 point)

Basic information with adequate research supporting main points
Adequate structure with identifiable sections and reasonable organization
Some business vocabulary with appropriate but limited specialized terms
Minor citation issues but sources are generally properly attributed
Few language errors that don’t significantly impact comprehension
Some integration of course concepts with basic application

Ineffective/Incomplete (0 points)

Insufficient information indicating inadequate research or analysis
Poor structure with unclear sections or illogical organization
Limited vocabulary with minimal use of specialized business terms
Numerous errors in language, grammar, or citation format
Below word count or significantly exceeds requirements
Little to no integration of course concepts or terminology

Recorded Presentation (2 points)

Your video presentation will be evaluated on delivery skills, language usage, and professional presentation techniques.

Effective (2 points)

Clear articulation with appropriate pace and professional delivery
Professional demeanor with confident body language and eye contact
Effective vocabulary using specialized business terms appropriately
Equal participation from all group members with smooth transitions
Adheres to time limits (15-20 minutes) with well-paced content
Engaging delivery that maintains audience interest without reading from script

Mostly effective/Somewhat ineffective (1 point)

Adequate articulation with generally clear communication
Somewhat professional delivery with minor hesitations or nervousness
Basic vocabulary with some use of business terminology
Mostly equal participation though some members may dominate slightly
Generally within time limits with acceptable pacing
Reasonable delivery though may occasionally rely on notes or slides

Ineffective/Incomplete (0 points)

Poor articulation with unclear speech or inappropriate pace
Unprofessional delivery with distracting mannerisms or obvious script reading
Limited vocabulary with minimal use of course-related terminology
Dominated by one member with unequal participation
Significantly over/under time limits or poor pacing throughout
Monotone or disengaged delivery that fails to maintain audience interest

Peer Evaluations (2 points)

Your evaluations of other groups’ presentations will be assessed on critical analysis skills and constructive feedback quality.

Effective (2 points)

Detailed, specific feedback with concrete examples and evidence
Constructive comments that demonstrate critical analysis skills
Application of course concepts in evaluation and feedback
Professional tone that is respectful while being honest
Actionable recommendations for improvement
Clear understanding of business communication standards

Mostly effective/Somewhat ineffective (1 point)

Basic observations with some specific examples
Somewhat constructive comments though may lack depth
Some application of course concepts in evaluation
Generally respectful tone with appropriate feedback delivery
General suggestions for improvement with limited specificity

Ineffective/Incomplete (0 points)

Superficial comments with vague or unhelpful observations
Little constructive value with criticism that lacks substance
No clear application of course concepts or standards
Inappropriate tone that is either too harsh or completely uncritical
Generic feedback that could apply to any presentation

Organization & Delivery (2 points)

This component evaluates your project management skills, file organization, and adherence to submission requirements.

Effective (2 points)

All materials submitted on time with complete components
Professionally organized with clear file naming and folder structure
Clearly labeled files that are easy to navigate and identify
Follows all format requirements including file types, word counts, and specifications
Easy to navigate with logical organization that facilitates review
Demonstrates project management skills through coordinated team effort

Mostly effective/Somewhat ineffective (1 point)

Materials submitted on time with most components complete
Adequately organized with reasonable file structure
Mostly labeled properly with minor naming inconsistencies
Generally follows format requirements with minor deviations
Reasonably easy to navigate with acceptable organization

Ineffective/Incomplete (0 points)

Late submission or missing required components
Disorganized materials with poor file structure or naming
Improper labeling that makes identification difficult
Fails to follow format requirements for file types or specifications
Difficult to navigate due to poor organization or missing elements

Additional Evaluation Considerations

Integration of Course Learning

Throughout all components, evaluators will look for evidence of:

Unit 1 concepts: Professional communication skills and ethical analysis
Unit 2 concepts: Legal and financial terminology where relevant
Unit 3 concepts: Process management and quality frameworks
Unit 4 concepts: Intercultural competency and team collaboration
Unit 5 concepts: Global business awareness and technology integration

Professional Standards

All components should demonstrate:

Language precision appropriate for international business contexts
Cultural sensitivity in analysis and recommendations
Ethical considerations in research methodology and conclusions
Professional presentation standards throughout all deliverables

Grade Conversion

9-10 points: Exceptional work demonstrating internalization (A level)
8 points: Proficient work meeting most expectations (B level)
6-7 points: Adequate work with some deficiencies (C level)
Below 6 points: Inadequate work requiring significant improvement

Feedback Process

Instructor Feedback

You will receive detailed feedback on:

Specific strengths demonstrated in each component
Areas for improvement with concrete suggestions
Assessment of language development and business vocabulary usage
Recommendations for continued professional development

Peer Feedback Integration

Your peer evaluations contribute to your learning by:

Providing multiple perspectives on presentation effectiveness
Demonstrating critical analysis skills application
Offering insights into audience perception and engagement
Building professional feedback and evaluation competencies

📥 Download Final Project Evaluation

Find this file on our repo and download it!

🤖 AI Study Prompts

Copy the downloaded evaluation criteria and try these prompts:

“Help me create a self-assessment checklist based on these evaluation criteria”
“What are the key differences between ‘meets expectations’ and ‘exceeds expectations’ for each component?”
“How can I ensure my project demonstrates integration of all course units?”
“Create a timeline for quality review based on these evaluation standards”

Next: Complete your learning journey with the Course Conclusion that celebrates your achievements and outlines next steps.